When the month was over and the
revenue figures were compiled, the numbers were up compared with a year before,
but were below plan. With strong results from earlier in the year, the monthly
results were not cause for concern. The management team, as was their practice,
met to discuss results and define actions for the remainder of the year to
ensure forecasts was met. The meetings were held onsite in the company
conference room. Given the personalities on the management team, discussions
were “lively”, at times even intense but always with the goal of developing a
shared solution.
The day following the management
meetings, the “vibe” in the company was unusually tense. Whispers of failure to
meet plan were tied to “overhearing yelling in the boardroom”.
By the late morning, the Executive
Assistant approached the President to enquire if the company was o.k.?
Surprised at the question, he answered that indeed the firm was O.K. and
wondered about the reason for the question. He was floored to learn that office
scuttlebutt had it that the company was readying to lay off employees because
of poor financial results.
A hastily called company meeting,
followed by an email from the President, shared news that though the company had
indeed failed to make plan, good results from earlier in the year provided some
cushion such that the results were satisfactory, year to date and the
management team was confident that the targets for the remainder of the year
were attainable.
In hindsight, perhaps the thought
process that led employees’ to speculate that a layoff was imminent was
predictable. Fueled by constant media attention on a “bad economy”,
difficulties and bailouts in the financial and auto sector, rising
unemployment, employees are primed for “bad news”.
Hearing that the company had missed
targets, coupled by heated dialogue in a closed door management meeting, led
even those with “inactive” imaginations to assume the worst.
Fortunately, the leadership group
was able to address the rumour and diffuse it before significant damage was
done. The situation points to the increased importance of communications in a
timely and transparent manner, especially during difficult times.